Home » Featured, politics & pop culture

Was Jesus Packing Heat?

Submitted by Travis Mamone on January 22, 2010 – 3:38 pmView Comments
Print This Post

It’s been said, “God created man in His image, and then man returned the favor.” I always think of that quote when I try to figure out how the Jesus of modern American Christian culture can be the same Jesus I read about in the Gospels. Maybe I’m just reading my Bible wrong, but I don’t remember Jesus being anti-immigration, or pro-consumerist, or pro-preemptive strikes on foreign countries that may or may not have WMDs. And as far as I know, there’s nothing in the Bible that suggests that Jesus was packing heat. Yet for some reason, I keep seeing more depictions of Jesus as a gun-toting Chuck Norris bad-ass, which is a big change from the guy hanging half-naked and humiliated on the cross.

You may remember a few months ago a Kentucky pastor told his congregation to bring their guns to church for a special Second Amendment celebration. The event included “a handgun raffle, patriotic music, and information on gun safety.” Even though I’m not a big fan of guns, I have no problem with gun shows in and of themselves. However, I do have a slight problem with gun shows being held at church. Isn’t the Church supposed to preach the Word of God before anything else, including the Constitution? This was also not too long after George Tiller was shot in front of his church, so in my mind a gun would have been the last thing any Christian wanted to see at a church.

Then recently we found out that several rifles used by the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan were encoded with Bible verses. A spokesperson for the rifle manufacturer, Trijicon, said they used the verses to provide “never-ending support and prayers” for U.S. troops. I believe in supporting the troops, too, but I’m not sure how putting Bible verses on guns can be an effective ministry tool. Maybe it’s just me, but I usually don’t associate the Prince of Peace with blowing off some guy’s head.

Of course I can understand why we “return the favor” and try to create God in our image: we all want a god to whom we can relate. Secretly we all want to serve a god who likes the same things and hates the same people we do. It makes our iniquities okay. Unfortunately, we are only worshiping a projection of our own wants and desires, and not the true God. And, unfortunately, I’m guilty of this just as much as the next guy.

The prophet Isaiah writes that one day God will make all the nations beat their swords into plowshares, and theirs into pruning hooks. But in the meantime, taking the Bible references off the rifles is a good start.

http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png

About Travis Mamone

Converse All-Star wearing, indie folk listening, always questioning, book loving, coffee addicted, emerging Christian freelance writer. He has contributed to Relevant Magazine, Burnside Writers Collective, Jesus Manifesto, and The Upper Room. He lives in Easton, MD, blogs at www.travismamone.net, and podcasts at www.coffeechatspodcast.com.

  • my thoughts as well. the image of Christ carrying a machine gun has often been cast in some of our "christian" efforts.
  • Bob G
    But he did take the time to make a whip and use it while he trashed those who had commercialized spirituality. So there's a time and a place, right?

    Don't get me wrong: I'm on your side with the dopiness of the gun-blessing, gun-show-having church. But if I were on a battlefield, having a constant reminder of God's love for me inscribed into my weapon would be a comfort.
  • Put psalm 11:5 on your barrel and smoke it "those who love violence his soul hates."
  • I actually disagree on the last paragraph. This prophecy (which appears twice in the Canon) is a prophecy of the Messiah who is Jesus. The "nations" all flow to him, and that is not a nation-state, but an image of the Kingdom of God being opened to the Gentiles and the whole earth. They all flow to him, and become a new nation, one that does beat their swords into plowshares upon entering into the new Kingdom, which is "here!" It's not some far off thing.
  • mariakirby
    I just ran across another verse that would be good to put on gun sights: Ps 17:4 "By the words of your lips I have kept myself from the ways of the violent."
  • While I find the entire concept to be lowbrowed and diametricly opposed to a loving God, my horrible sense of sarcasm won't stop asking: Why didn't they take something from Psalm 136 like, "To God who struck down first-born of Egypt, God is lasting love." (Ps 136:10)

    I'm just sayin'...
  • thecharismanglican
    Wow! A faith-based initiative to kill Muslims more efficiently!

    Here's a Bible verse suggestion for Trijicon's next rifle scope: "Jesus wept."
  • thecharismanglican
    Bible verse suggestion for the gun muzzles:

    "Jesus wept."
  • Monique
    All I can say is, "Yeah, baby!"
  • escambron
    The link is remote and, to me, somehow vital. Travis gave a beginning of a quote 'God created man in His image' ('man' in this case in Hebrew I believe meaning humanity, thus not as narrow as it has rapidly become). By leaving male and female out, Travis, unknowingly I am sure, has done what is repeatedly done in the Catholic lectionary -- woman/women/female become invisible.

    My comment forgot to address Travis' whole post, which is really good and with which I agree all along. Frankly I had never heard of this pastor asking his congregation to bring their guns. Like on Oct 4, when Franciscan parishes asked the pets to be brought for blessings...

    So, yes, you're right. There was no link between this great post and my comment. It is just that I was hit by the absence of 'male and female' and wanted to react to that very loud absence -- for me.

    Thank you for asking.
  • escambron
    Hi there,
    Gen 1:27 says, God created man in his image; in the divine image he created him; male and female he created them.
    Interesting how that 'female' part is overlooked by so many male preachers -- unless of course they see it as a sex object. But God as a sex object... Not so nice, hey?
    And though the day 'female' is also seen as made in the Divine Image, THAT day maybe finally women will be seen and will see themselves in a different way.
    Thank you for your post.
  • I agree with your thoughts, escambron, I guess I don't see the relation between inclusive language and and this specific topic. I'd be interested to see that further explained.

    Great post, tmamone!
  • Just playing devil's advocate here, but couldn't you be 'returning the favour', too?

    :P

    I agree with the gist of the article, but statements like that tend to bite back.
  • What are you talking about? I always get it right.

    I'm kidding!!!!

    Seriously, it's true, I could be returning the favor as well. I briefly mentioned in the article that I'm as guilty as creating God in my image as much as the next guy. For example, I like to think that God hates Pat Robertson and slow drivers as much as I do. But there's nothing in the Bible that says they're excluded from God's grace, so that's just my projection, y'know?
blog comments powered by Disqus