Home » Featured, story & idea

Why I want to go to hell.

Submitted by Richard Beck on December 30, 2009 – 4:13 pmView Comments
Print This Post

When you tell people you believe (or hope for) universal reconciliation the knee jerk reaction is that you don’t believe in hell.

Well, I believe in hell. I believe in hell for two reasons.

First, humans have committed horrific evils and the notion that God’s wrath isn’t kindled in the face of these atrocities is ludicrous. Universalism isn’t some sweet, wishy washy, lovey dovey position. Victims demand justice. Evil needs to be punished. I think it very clear that Jesus speaks about God’s moral fury in very harsh eschatological language.

But the second and perhaps more shocking reason I believe in hell is because I want to go to hell. I need to go to hell.

Here’s the deal. God hates sin. As do I. Hell is the biblical metaphor for this Divine fury. Consequently, I don’t want to be saved from the consequences of my sin. I don’t want a get out of jail free card. If I am selfish, petty, or vindictive then I want to be free from those sins, not from their consequences. As the Advent readings told us, Jesus came to set us free from sin. Not from hell. Hell is how we get freed from sin. Hell is a mutual participation between God’s wrath and my own, directed at those aspects of my life that are stupid, selfish or shameful. I hate it when I act like a jerk to my children or family or anyone else. And that hatred is a participation in the wrath of God, a participation in hell. And this wrath isn’t self-loathing, depressive or neurotic. It’s the simple and healthy recognition that I have moral work to do in my life. And anger is a wonderfully motivating emotion. I believe in hell because I need it. We all need it. And the worst thing you could tell me is that I’d be rescued from it.

I don’t want to live in eternity as I am right now. I don’t want God to see Jesus when he sees me. I want God to see me, honestly, in all my sin and failure. True, God will be upset with that vision. As am I. God’s grace is the fact that God won’t destroy me for these failures, God will not treat me according to my sin. Jesus died for me, loved me, while I was a sinner. That much is clear. So grace isn’t the removal of consequences. It is, rather, the notion that consequences aren’t the issue anymore. God is on my side. He always has been. It’s unconditional love. With that out of the way this means God and I can get on with the business of fighting the sin in my life. Being perfect as my heavenly Father is perfect. And God and I do this together. That’s why hell is a manifestation of God’s grace. Hell is a partnership, the hard and often hellish work God and I do together to help me conform to the image of Christ.

This is, obviously, a odd view of hell. But it is simply the logic of the parenting metaphors in the bible, that God is a loving Father. All parents want their children to move from extrinsic to intrinsic motives in their moral development. That is, early in life the threat of pain (e.g., a spanking) keeps me on the straight and narrow. An aversive consequence from the outside motivates me. But, as we all know, if I stay stuck with these external motivations I fail to develop into a decent person. I’ll only do good for a reward and I’ll only avoid vice because I might get caught. What we want from our children is for them to shift from these extrinsic motivations toward intrinsic motives. We want our children to start doing good for issues associated with identity, character, and joy. We want them to good because they want to, not because they have to.

In my comments about hell above I’m making a similar argument. As long as hell remains an extrinsic motivator, an external consequence, then our moral development remains stagnant. The same goes for heaven. And we all know this. Trying to be good to “go to heaven” always strikes self-reflective people as ridiculous.

In short, we need to move hell from the extrinsic to the intrinsic. I shouldn’t fear hell like a child fears a spanking. Rather, as I spiritually grow I internalize hell, I participate in the wrath of God, living by its logic. Further, as a child grows morally his goal isn’t to escape punishment but to face the consequences of his choices courageously and with integrity. And, yes, if you’ve ever faced up to the messes you’ve made in life, that experience is hell. In AA it’s called the 12 Steps.

Is this works-based righteousness? No. I can’t do it myself. I need grace. I need hell.

Praise be to God.

http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png

About Richard Beck

Richard Beck is Associate Professor and experimental psychologist at Abilene Christian University. He blogs at experimentaltheology.blogspot.com.

  • thecharismanglican
    Oh that old belief? I thought that was called purgatory.
  • Leo Day Hennacy
    You said: "Trying to be good to 'go to heaven' always strikes self-reflective people as ridiculous." Maybe not "always," but definitely a lot. I think trying to be loving for example, should be an expression of a inner truth, of God within, rather than as a way to gain floors in an elevator up to heaven.

    Well put!
  • Very intriguing perspective. Much of it seems more consistent with God and how so many Christians understand him, than does the more popular view of hell. Thanks. Much to think about, especially as I've been slowly going through E. Fudge's "The Fire That Consumes."
  • mariakirby
    I like how you express hell as form of grace. That fits much better into the character of God than traditional views of hell being a form of retribution.
  • I have no problem with a pedagogical God, raising and instructing us like a good parent. I have no problem with a "refiner's fire" helping in productive ways to cleanse me and perfect me. But I don't think these things can be conflated with Hell.

    First of all, I don't think Hell is really "the Biblical metaphor for divine fury". Hell is a doctrine, constructed no doubt with Biblical support, but there is no clear and singular "hell" in the Bible. There are a variety of words which mean different things. The Bible doesn't give us a clear picture of the afterlife, but the doctrine of Hell as the church has usually expressed it is crystal clear: Hell is a destination for the reprobate after death.

    The doctrine of Hell isn't helpful and is better jettisoned because it promotes a picture of God which is incorrect - an unjust torturer tyrant. It promotes an anthropology which is incorrect - disembodied eternal souls. It promotes laughably incorrect metaphysics - a supernatural realm under the earth where all the dead reside?

    Hell is a bad idea. But the Bible clearly does talk about God's wrath and it uses a lot of different metaphors, and some of those metaphors when expressed through a loving petagogic lens can be fruitfully put to the purpose you are describing here. Some suffering in this life is educational. Perhaps the same is true after death. Who knows?

    However, not all suffering in this life is educational and I strongly resist the temptation to say that all bad stuff comes from God as a lesson to sinful humans. That way lies crazy talk. God sent Katrina to punish New Orleans for Mardi Gras don't you know?

    It is true, for example, in the 12 steps, that the process of redemption involves some suffering. But it is not true that an alcoholic inflicting suffering on themself and their family absent the move toward redemption (ie: outside the 12 steps/falling off the wagon) is being instructed in holiness. The first kind of suffering is part of sanctification. The second kind, the meaningless kind of suffering, is what we usually mean by Hell. From Hell we just need to be rescued.

    I think the Orthodox get it right in their icons of Jesus rising from the grave - taking Adam and Eve out of Hell. Hell is not a productive place. Hell is genocide in the Sudan. Hell is heroine addiction. Hell is the cycle of domestic violence. People in Hell need a savior, not a teacher. People on the other side of Hell can, with time, benefit from a teacher, but not while they're in it.
  • Brandon
    This video sermon on the subject of Hell and the refining fire would shed a lot of light on this conversation i believe. Check it out, it really is fantastic.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCibySGAMzU&feat...
  • Here is the thing that confuses me about this argument: You say you want God to see you in your sin, but you also said Jesus took your sin away. If Jesus took your sin away, what sin is it you think God will be seeing at your Judgment? What does it mean for Jesus to take our sin away, then? Do you not believe in a final judgment?

    You also go on to say that "hell" is how we get our sin taken away from us. I thought Jesus took it away? So then why is Jesus needed?

    You say that getting rid of the sin in your life is something you and God can do together. So Christ's death and resurrection were not quite enough to accomplish this? You need to put some effort into it too? Your sin wasn't totally taken away by Jesus, it was just taken away theoretically?

    (I am asking these questions to understand your argument. I hope they don't strike you as being snarky, they aren't meant to be!)

    It seems your whole argument depends on the beginning assumption that hell is just a metaphor for "Divine fury" aka discipline. Not sure I buy that assumption, must think on it some more. But I do agree with what you have to say about internalizing the anger and hatred for sin, rather than just operating on fear of extrinsic punishment. If that is your only point, then I agree 100%, even if the way you have worded it doesn't sit right. :)
blog comments powered by Disqus