Home » Featured, story & idea

He Raises the Dead

Submitted by joshlinton on December 3, 2009 – 8:27 pmView Comments
Print This Post

raisingthedeadThe gist of the story goes like this: God told Abraham to go kill his son, his only son, the son of promise and offer him as a sacrifice. Abraham goes. (Geneses 22)

God ultimately stopped Abraham before he sliced the knife across Isaac’s throat, but that hasn’t kept that knife from stabbing away at me. In frustrating irony, this story of deep faith takes me to the brink of overwhelming doubt. In the wake of this dark story my mind floods with contradiction and frustration. It seems so wrong.

What was God thinking? What a hideous test of faith! How can you play with a father’s emotions and moral sensibilities just to prove a point? He commands Abraham to enter a ritual only practiced among the barbaric cultures of paganism. How could you really blame Abraham had he screamed at God, “Forget you! You’re not who I thought you were if this is how it’s going to be! Take your promise and leave me alone.”

Did Abraham understand something I don’t? He had to.

Exploring this question has eased some of the angst that I feel trying to reconcile my confusion and outrage over God’s request to have Isaac sacrificed. I have discovered that the contradictions and bewilderment incited by this account eventually shrivel against the reality of a God who raises the dead. Honest reflection reveals the acceptance of this reality to be the ace card Abraham had up his sleeve. “He considered that God was able even to raise him from the dead” (Hebrews 11:19).

Maybe Abraham was incensed at the order of God. Surely his head spun in a whirl of moral dilemmas. Didn’t matter. The insight we have from the writer of Hebrews suggests that no matter what preposterous conclusions could be drawn from God’s actions, Abraham’s operative reality was that God raises the dead. This functional belief directed and informed every decision of Abraham’s life. Even apparent absurdities and possible moral failure connected to God weren’t able to overturn the astonishing truth that God raises the dead, which above all else solicits faithful allegiance. That lens cleared the blurry appearances of Abraham’s world and enabled him to see from God’s perspective.

Paul also connects the fundamental acceptance of God’s ability to raise the dead to Abraham’s incredible, head-spinning faith. He writes that Abraham persisted “in the presence of the God in whom he believed, who gives life to the dead and calls into existence the things that do not exist. In hope he believed against hope, that he should become the father of many nations, as he had been told” (Romans 4:17-18). Abraham wasn’t crazy, just able to see beyond temporal illusions.

Once clutched by the historical certainty of Jesus’ resurrection, Paul possessed the same vision as Abraham. He wrote in 2 Corinthians 1:8-9, “For we do not want you to be ignorant, brothers and sisters, of the affliction we experienced in Asia. For we were utterly burdened beyond our strength that we despaired of life itself. Indeed, we felt that we had received the sentence of death. But that was to make us rely not on ourselves but on God who raises the dead.” Paul confidently stared into the hollow eyes of death because of his pledge to the deeper truth. He leaned heavily upon the tangible implications of Jesus’ resurrection and so pursued Jesus relentlessly in spite of the supposed irrationality of it all (1 Corinthians 15).

Human existence since the fall has thrown some nasty things at us. Evil and chaos show up in such ways that cynicism can take over our lives. Relativism and nihilism emerge as viable options. What can God do? Look at the world and its mess, where is he? In fear, we begin to react to such confusion. Our humanity slips away. We run scared as fast as we can into the abyss of despair and hopelessness. We live out our days numbing ourselves to a dysfunctional society we can’t or don’t want to confront.

The mind can’t answer it’s own questions. We “common sense” ourselves right out of following God. What works often supersedes discipleship. Love doesn’t work so we hate and manipulate. Peace makes little sense so we fight. Integrity gets us nowhere so we cheat and steal. Guilt takes over so we kill it with drugs and decadence.

Why? Because we’re scared and not sure what we’re scared of…just scared. Scared to follow the pathways of our confusion. Scared to run into what’s behind all this mess. But if Abraham and Paul have a word for us, it is hope. Hope in a truth too often shrouded in fear. If they have a command for us then, it is “Do not fear!” Do not fear because of the hope anchored in a God who raises the dead.

So from the dark oblivion of this dim vision a beam of light breaks through.

The monsters that frighten us scurry to darker corners. Death slowly loses its leverage. As the light begins to disperse its way throughout the darkness, we start to see things for what they are. The vision of a God who raises the dead comes into focus. We see what Abraham saw. We squint through Paul’s eyes at the open arms of the resurrected Messiah.

But I suppose now, as these views collide, we stand on a mountain somewhere in Moriah with a knife in one hand and choice to make. All our senses and wits tell us to run. Our blood pressure rises as fear regroups. We sigh at the palpable contradictions imposing their demands for practicality. We question just what in the name of God is going on. It is in this moment God asks us to consider his perspective.

I raise the dead. Don’t fear. Follow me.

If we do, we will see to begin crawling our way out of the abyss of confused intuitions and misguided apprehensions. We will, no matter what seems to be, follow that truth: I raise the dead, do not fear.

http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png

About joshlinton

you can learn a little about me at joshlinton.net.

  • mariakirby
    Josh,
    I thought you wrote a very good piece.

    There have been several times in my life where I felt like God was calling me to enter into situations where there was a great chance that I would experience abuse, where normally I would protect myself, and which I would never advise someone else to enter into those kind of situations. I don't believe God wanted me to experience abuse, but by entering into those situations voluntarily, it communicated love, it brought about a change in heart on the part of the other person that wasn't happening prior to that situation when I was trying to protect myself.

    Those situations seemed like a test of my faith in whether or not I believed in a God that was all powerful and can work everything out for good, and in whether I believed that forgiveness was more powerful than evil. And somehow by my being faithful to follow God's direction, God was able to break the chains of sin that bound those that hurt me.
  • Thanks, Maria, for the insight and encouragement.
  • Ed
    Reply,
    thanks so much for all of your responses. I am amazed at your commitment to correspond so willingly with me, a stranger. I find them helpful and meaningful, and even powerful. I like the idea of tying faith in the resurrection to a specific ideas about resistance to empire. Thanks for the reading material. I will look into that.
  • Daniel
    Umm, hmmm....

    It's one thing to buy the author of Hebrews' interpretation of the sacrifice narrative (which I don't), it's another to think it's there in the Old Testament (it's not). What's there in the Old Testament is the relative triviality of human life (Isaac stands not for himself, as an individual, but rather for the fulfillment of God's promise to Abraham--that's what's being sacrificed... not a person), and the supreme command to 'obey' (or, put more positively, 'trust').

    Personally, I think it's a terrible story, both in the Old Testament and in the New. But I'm glad most Christians allegorize it (at some level, I think you do too).

    What does it mean for God to raise the dead? Even if you take Jesus' resurrection to be a concrete event, he's no sooner raised than he disappears again. So frankly I have trouble seeing how the literal event is relevant to the life of the Christian. It has metaphorical dimensions which are well worth emphasizing, but the metaphor of new life in dark places is available regardless of whether you believe 'Death' is an enemy to overcome or not (it is only if you take it metaphorically on my view).

    Anyway, for every moment of despair there's a moment of hope. And for every moment of hope, there's a moment of despair. I'll be the yang to your yin.

    Peace,
    -Daniel-
  • You had me until you suggested that the literal concreteness of the
    resurrection isn't relevant to how we live our lives...would you flesh that
    out a bit? Christ's resurrection would seem like thin existential gruel if
    it were metaphorical (like the way that, for example, Romero said he would
    be raised up in the people of El Salvador).
  • Ed
    Why is that "existential gruel"? Could you flesh that out for me? I guess I can understand what you are saying. But at the same time, In my mind I am thinking and believing this notion in Romero's mind is not existential gruel. This belief is what permitted him to take that stand and proclaim God or all of the people in a way that demonstrates true love, not just love for "believers."
  • I didn't mean that as a slam against Romero. In fact, I'm almost certain
    that Romero believed in the physical resurrection of Christ. My point is
    that a historic resurrection is not just quaint sentiment for many
    Christians (including me). It goes much deeper than that.
  • Ed
    ok. can you say a little more on the ramifications of the a historic resurrection of a body? I am serious.
  • Ed
    is is just Jesus's body? Please don't think I am any way being disingenuous.
  • Ed
    or maybe you could give suggest something good to read.
  • Ed,

    I know you're speaking with Mark, but I'd like to, at least, give my opinion. I find no hope outside of the concrete, historic resurrection of Jesus. Because of this event I have a reason to believe in a real reversal of injustice, oppression, the lack of shalom. The joys and existential peace inherent in God's creative expression is affirmed in the resurrection.

    That's rather sparse but it's my hope so far.
  • Ed
    That is beautiful. Tell me, did you ever have any difficulty in believing in the physical resurrection?
  • Ed
    I am sorry. This sounds like I am trying to encourage skepticism. I am not. It is just that I have been a skeptic since the fifth grade when I told my fifth grade teacher there was no hell. I went from there to an athiest, to a believer of sorts in college. I embraced God and the basic values of Christianity. But never really the miracles. Then I read Marcus Borg. He gave me great peace saying I did not have to worry about believing in things that were difficult to believe, that it was more about beloving and experiencing the reality of the God of compassion, and becoming transformed to love. I have almost left the faith. But Borg has held me in, and I realized that we need the scripture as something to hold us together. Otherwise, don't get me wrong the Unitarians are excellent people, but I think they are definitely missing something. People might say I am a great product of the enlightenment. I guess I am wondering if that is so bad, but also why it is so difficult for me to be a "believer" as some here define it. I am wondering if I am wrong or at least missing out. It seems difficult to just jump over authentically to the "believing" side at this point, although it could happen. Don't get me wrong I believe I experience the mystical reality of God and the kingdom, But still the miracles are still really an going problem for me. Because I read the posts here, and I like them, but I don't have exactly the same outlook.
    Are there any ideas out there?
  • Ed,

    There are some interesting books out there on the significance of the Resurrection. N.T. Wright has written a fair bit about this.

    Also, I have great respect for liberation theologian Jon Sobrino's approach to the resurrection (perhaps best seen in his work, Christ the Liberator).

    Sobrino rightly points out that the Resurrection isn't simply about reanimating a corpse. It is about vindication:

    "In the Christian tradition the fate of human beings is understood in the light of the fate of Jesus. What we need to be clear about is that Jesus did not end his life 'in the fullness of days' but as a 'victim,' and that his resurrection did not consist in giving life back to a corpse but in giving justice back to a victim. The central affirmation is then that 'the risen one is the crucified one'..."

    The Resurrection of Christ, for many, is the foundation for a future hope that all of the oppressed with be vindicated--including even the brokenness of Creation will be transformed. Yes, it may seem like a fairy tale, but it is one that I gladly embrace.
  • Daniel
    Oh Ed, don't feel so bad. Follow the truth wherever it leads.
    One possibility is of course that the truth is painful. I only recently stopped believing in the historicity of the Resurrection (because theologically it's connected to the doctrine of the Ascension, which is connected to the event of Pentecost, which is connected to the doctrine of the Holy Spirit--and the Holy Spirit is precisely what seems strangely absent from Christianity), but that's been a very painful discovery. The world is not what I thought it would be. It's entirely possible that honest reflection could lead to MORE existential angst rather than less. Some say agnosticism is cowardice, but as a newly minted agnostic, I'd say it takes courage to say "I really don't know"--even when it hurts.

    Anyway, the lesson is don't MAKE yourself believe anything. Just follow the truth humbly and clothe yourself with love for all people, Christians, agnostic and otherwise.

    Peace,
    -Daniel-
  • joanpball
    Hi Daniel: As a lifelong atheist turned agnostic in my early 30s who came to Christian faith at age 37 by grace rather than decision, I am curious when you say the Holy Spirit is absent in Christianity. Would you mind sharing more on that?
  • Ed
    Daniel, thank you for your considered response. God bless on your journey, I do believe that there is a God whose love gives us peace and hope. Keep searching and listening.
  • I think the statement connecting the historicity of the Resurrection to the Ascension, Pentecost, and the Holy Spirit, is a powerful thing we cannot take lightly. However, I want to differ in the conclusion, in that I take it to be an example of one of the massive failures of Christendom, rather than evidence that the resurrection is not a historical reality.

    I specifically mention Christendom because it is my opinion that the experience of the Spirit (by that I use miracles as only one example, and also mean various spiritual gifts and such) fades from the church when it seeks political power as it did, culminating in the Constantinian mess that we've found it so hard to get out of.

    I also find comfort in the fact that various renewal movements of the church - the Desert Fathers and Mothers, the Franciscans, the Quakers, the Anabaptists, and the early Pentecostals, for example - all resisted the power of the empire (in all the ways we often speak of that on this site) because they wanted the power of the Spirit. It completely saddens me that many of these movements lost both their resistance to the empire and their reliance on the Spirit, but the evidence suggests to me that they are connected things.

    I say all that to say that I think the reality of the resurrection should lead us to experience of the Spirit (whatever that looks like for individual folks and movements) and resistance to empire, and so on, and if it doesn't, we who do see it as a historical reality should question whether the belief in it means anything to us.
  • Daniel, I respect you, so I don't want to come off too harshly. The way you're approaching the Ressurection makes it all seem rather arbitrary. Fine if you want to be agnostic. But that doesn't mean that people grappling with faith should just lighten up and embrace the sort of skepticism they feel in their soul. The struggle between doubt and faith should be difficult.

    What does it mean to follow truth humbly and clothe oneself with love for all people? Of course I agree with that sentiment. But I honestly believe that how one understands the Resurrection (and Ascension and Pentecost and the Crucifixion--could you flesh out your statement about these things?) shapes what that looks like. It doesn't seem mere coincidence that many of the most remarkable Christian saints rooted their perseverance in the face of oppression and their love in the face of fear in their hope of the resurrection. Their hope wasn't for some sort of afterlife--but rather for the final vindication of all who suffer injustice and death.

    That is why the Resurrection matters to me. It isn't just that it means I can go to a happy place when I die. Instead, because Christ body was raised incorruptible, I know that all of creation is being made new. This might seem to be the naive province of peasants in hope of a better world (because, after all, the neo-gnosticism sweeping through our world are largely flowing from the academy), but it is a real hope.
  • Ed, I can honestly say that it's never been difficult for me to believe the physical resurrection of Jesus. I've read Borg too and appreciate so much his contribution to the conversations I've had in my head. But I have been unable (perhaps unwilling) to let go of the historicity of it because of what it implies for me. And I have a terrible time believing the early disciples suffered persecution for nothing. Something happened and the witness proclaims that Jesus came back from the dead.

    I will admit the connection to the Spirit that Daniel brought up did sting as that has been something on my mind...

    Thanks for the good discussion.
  • Daniel,

    It's refreshing to have you push back against my article. It forces me to confront some assertions and, perhaps, disconnects in my theology, etc.

    About the story, it still bothers me. But so does what seems to be the sum of my life. Just today my daughter, at age 8, can't quit crying at school because she is wrestling with social issues--in second grade! It sucks bad. Maybe it's my opiate, but I can't find hope at all if I don't believe Jesus launched a full-scale resurrection for all of life itself. That hope, for me, is anchored in the concrete event.

    I'll be honest though. The fact that he raised and then disappeared, or, if you'll grant it, sent his presence (Spirit) into a people, continually bothers me. Why live in transition? I've yet to fully work that out in my mind, maybe never will.

    Thanks for pressing me. I'm happy to be the yin.

    Josh
  • Thanks for the comments. We need resurrection and hope.
  • Monique
    I SO needed this today. Thank you so much. I forwarded it to a couple friends that I thought also needed to read something this full of hope.
  • It is absurd. And yet here we are, and resurrection drives us.
blog comments powered by Disqus