politics & pop culture

human civilization is a mix of both the ugly and the sublime. and so we offer both reflections and rants on life sandwiched between Kingdom and Empire. ++ submit an article ++

word & image

“art is a collaboration between God and the artist.” poetry and prose and image and song peel back the veil into deeper realities unobservable to the naked mind. ++ submit an article ++

story & idea

we are a part of a complex story that streams from the mouth of GOD. so we delve into scriptures, history, and thick books to find our place in God’s story. ++ submit an article ++

practice & resistance

the way of jesus is meant to be practiced. usually with others. this often requires resistance to the powers that seek to enslave us. viva la revolution! ++ submit an article ++

wit & satire

often, the most serious response to the world’s brokenness is humor. wit strips away layers of deception to reveal that the emperor has no clothes. ++ submit an article ++

Home » Featured, word & image

Good News for Whom?

Submitted by JoshuaDbauIII on November 4, 2009 – 11:49 amComments
Print This Post

dark-night-of-the-soulFor Christian theologians there are guiding ethics, (i.e. Enemy love, non-violence, Love for God and Neighbor, care for the earth, the poor, the orphan, the widow, the stranger etc.) that if not practiced stagnate the Christian way of life from its intended and earliest forms into dismal misconceptions. If the Christian does not put into practice these ethics, it transforms their entire attempt at religion into a contemptible facade. Christians cannot afford to neglect their mandate to care for the poor, the earth or to participate in a loving activism toward all others. These are examples that Jesus set before the church, that we were intended to follow. These ethics or ‘Gospel’ are present and have precedent in the earliest Christian writings and history and can be found throughout church history.

The Gospel literally means ‘good news’ in its original Koine Greek ‘euangelion’. The Gospel is God’s good news to the suffering, the dominated, the oppressed, the victimized and the marginalized persons in this world. The church, as most Christians understand it in the United States, is the body of believers both locally and globally who are to act as ambassadors and participants in Kingdom of God. The church is entrusted with the ‘good news” and is to proclaim and live out that good news in the hope of repairing and restoring the world. This Gospel is good news because it doesn’t merely rely information it is supposed to foster and provide solidarity and reconciliation among all people. Because the Gospel is an announcement that our world can change, that our world should change, that our world will change.

The church in the United States is almost unanimously guilty of the heresy of Gnosticism. The heresy includes the belief that secret knowledge that one must acquire leads one toward salvation. Special incantations and secret knowledge understood in specific ways allow one access to salvation. This was contested by the orthodox church in the fourth century as a major threat to the views implicitly held by the Church regarding the deity of Jesus. With the rise of Arius, an Alexandrian presbyter, and thus his ideas of Gnosticism becoming more formidable, they were examined and found to be a heresy by the early church fathers.

Yet the church in The U.S. today has these special prayers, and special doctrines, or things one ought to believe if they are to be a Christian. These special prayers and special doctrines vary from church to church and denomination to denomination. Many Evangelical churches refer to this special prayer as ‘the prayer’, it is an action where an individual asks Jesus Christ to come into their heart, to forgive their sins and to open their lives to Christ’s teachings.

This asking Jesus into ones life, refers to an individual accepting the Lordship or guidance of Christ as the force through which they will attempt to live differently in this world. This prayer allows one to give up the things in which they were previously held captive to, addictions, emotional scars etc, through the healing power of Christ, or so the claim of many attest. However, if one where to attempt to find these mandates in the New Testament or the Hebrew scriptures they would discover that this special knowledge and these special prayers are entirely undetectable.

There is no mention in the Christian scriptures of any sort of special prayer that one must pray in order to become a follower of Jesus. There is no mandated or required cannon of theological principles one must acquire or accept in order to become a Christian. There is not a theological statement that one must understand or an amount of scriptures one must have memorized in order for the good news to be for them. The Gospel is an announcement, not a secret, that the way in which the world is currently is not the way in which it is supposed to be, nor the way in which it will always be.

The Gospel is God’s loving, accepting, forgiving, exciting, shocking, counter-cultural announcement that our world is not the world. This announcement to those who don’t have everything together in the way that the world tells them they should have it together. It is an announcement to those who are not thin, attractive, rich, smooth, charming, intelligent or that are getting ahead in this world. Rather it is an announcement to those who have a feeling that they are not getting their slice of the pie, to those who are always falling behind, to those who can’t get it all together. Its the Good News that all the marks that this world tells us are important really aren’t that important, that we were created to love and to be loved, to repair and to be repaired to restore and to be restored, that dear readers is Good News.

  • I applaud your thesis of the gospel containing guiding ethics, (i.e. Enemy love, non-violence, Love for God and Neighbor, care for the earth, the poor, the orphan, the widow, the stranger etc.) but I think you overstate the gnosticism you see in evangelicalism.

    As a broadly evangelical follower of Christ, I was never taught that any specific prayer or form of words is needed. However, it's more than "guiding ethics". A Christian must make an act of will - a surrender - to God through Christ and begin an apprenticeship (discipleship) of repentance and service. Jesus asked us to "make disciples of all nations" not converts. There's no secret here.

    But we will agree that true worship and real sacrifice for God is to pour ourselves out for those in need and to have our lives burn brightly with God's ways.

    A man could follow all the guiding ethics you speak of and still reject Christ. Jesus makes all the difference.
  • you, yourself, have just presented such a formula that the author is speaking of. gnostics and other mystery cult religious loved to take phrases out of context such as "make disciples of all nations," interpret those fragments of whole discourses as tools to effect a certain set of phenomena, and claim that they alone were able to understand - by virtue of their own initiation into the same. i'm an evangelical also, went door to door proclaiming jesus, and i have found with time and through god's grace that the gospel is so much more than getting people to say certain words and present a certain surface. unfortunately, when the magic words don't work, you have people who think god has abandoned them when god hasn't. god merely works in a more powerful and subtle way than american consumer attitudes - not much different than the mystery cults of greece and rome - expect and demand.
  • joshuadbau
    I agree that in your context perhaps the gnostic reference is overstated, but in many churches that I have visited, they have special words to use and certain ways of saying them in order to be 'authentic' this is in many regards a basic definition of gnosticism. And I have seen secret knowledge in many evangelical churches or doctrinal statements with with one must agree or it is 'deal breaker', simply because you are not from this persuasion has nothing to do with the reality that many evangelicals do live in this persuasion.
  • The majority of people in the USA are promoting, teaching, and living a false form of Christianity. They actually are opposite of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
    One sure way to know if you have made the transformation from being a citizen of this world to being a Citizen of the Kingdom of Heaven is to denounce you loyalty to your nation and put away your flag and stop pledging your allegiance to your nation and flag, and to stop supporting your nation's troops and your nation's political leaders who sent those troops off to war.
    Try this first in the mirror, then try saying it to some friends and family members.
    After you get over feeling guilty and sinful, you will actually start to feel like a real Christian and a true Citizen of the Kingdom of Heaven.
  • I like your article, however had a few questions about some of the things you say:

    1. The concept of "Gnosticism in the United States" seems like a grandiose statement. The duality of spirit and body, the ascetic treatment of the body, and the renounciation of "worldly things," concepts represented by Gnostics from the Joachimites to the Albigesians, stand in contradiction to a country of self-indulgence, materialism, and egocentrism. I was hoping you could elaborate on this.

    2. "There is not a theological statement that one must understand...in order for the good news to be for them." But doesn't this type of thought lead to a distortion of the Good News by people who influence the Word with their own bias? If all we bring is our faith (and with that, our experience), then haven't we as people of faith limited ourselves and our understanding of the Divine? From David Koresh to William Simmons to Fred Phelps, people have continuously distorted Christian values throughout history.(with respect to list of Christian values given at the beginning of your article) Doesn't there need to be some mechanism upon which people can encounter the Word of God without their own preferences and biases trumping the Good News?

    As a Catholic and a Capuchin friar, I recognize my bias towards an established method where people can grow in their faith. And while I never wish to minimize the importance the Spirit plays in our development of faith, I feel there has to be something (i.e. the church) which sets guidelines, boundaries, and challenges us to live the Gospel.

    Thank you again for your article. I truly enjoyed it.
  • joshuadbau
    1. I think I was intending to only include the main heretical part of Gnosticism, there are many orthodox Christians who still cling to duality, ascetic treatment and the renunciation of worldly things, these were not what the Gnostic Christians were criticized for, it was for their 'special knowledge' and their secrets leading one to salvation.
    2. We all influence the word with our own bias, this is inescapable. I completely agree that there are extremes, that people twist the words of God to fit their own categories, but this is not Gospel transformation, it seems must more like Gospel manipulation. We are always finding excuses to continue to live and consume the things we believe to be normal, however, simply because we find peace in the tightly knit ball of contradictions that we all are does not mean that we have been converted in the way we live by the Gospel of Christ. I think the mechanism is the communion of saints, but not the institutional church, I think the mechanism is Christ existing as community among fellow believers that challenge us to be converted in the way we live not simply the way we think.
    Third I am very excited that you are a Capuchin friar, I have been to the Monastery/Church in Rome where that order started, and it was quite an inspirational experience. And I agree that there is something that sets guidelines, and boundaries, but it can never be the institutional church, for it has far too large a stake in the system of power and domination that the nations play. That authority can only be held by God, just as the authority of scripture does not depend upon church councils to be authoritative, that authority rests in God no in humanity. And let us be thankful that it lies in far better hands than our own.

    J
  • mariakirby
    I think another way that gnosticism rears its ugly head is in the way Christians pretend that they know how the world is going to end.
  • I agree. But I feel that this over-emphasis on the Apocolypse takes people's focus away from the realities of what's happening around them. Fear is used so readily as a motivator these days. Keeping people worried (or hoping) for the end of the is beneficial for those in charge, not for the marginalized.

    But perhaps my biggest issue with Gnosticism, and the reason I questioned it's use in the first place, is the removal of the humanity of Jesus that Gnostics so often stressed. The reality of Jesus' human existence and the self-emptying nature of the Incarnation is an important part of Franciscan spirituality.

    Besides, there's a movie coming out that says the world ends in 2012. If you can't trust Hollywood to bring you the Truth, who CAN you trust? =)
  • mariakirby
    At least hollywood's hype is based off of the real science of global warming instead of some theologian's preconceived box into which he puts ancient revelation, turns the crank, and wa-la out pops 42.
  • Ben
    Personally, I think relating the "Sinner's Prayer" to G(g)nosticism is a bit of a stretch. I've never seen a church say that you have to pray a certain prayer in a certain, specific format to be saved. Have you experienced otherwise?

    As I understand it, the "Sinner's Prayer" is simply a contextualized expression of what it means to know God through Christ -- i.e., the reality of sin in a person's life and their need for God's grace to redeem them, set them right, and point them towards the Kingdom of God by the gift of His Spirit. It has been broken down and simplified in many cases into the just a few sentences that must be repeated; however I don't see that using a specific prayer entails G(g)nosticism or the necessity of secret knowledge. As billions of publicly-distributed tracts can attest, it's not something kept secret. Evangelists of the traditional variety stand on street corners trying to convince people to pray that prayer. How does that equal secret knowledge?

    If a church thinks that the specific format of the Sinner's Prayer, or the Sinner's Prayer itself, is necessary for salvation, then they're definitely out of line. But the fact that they utilize it doesn't equate to secret knowledge or initiation rites.
  • joshuadbau
    I have experienced churches that have specific prayers, and some that simply adopt the Romans road theology etc. I believe that contextually you are correct, but there are many churches that do have this sort of mythical prayer belief and they attempt to promote Jesus as a formula. Your post made me think two things, first Jesus was a horrible evangelist, I mean he seems to always be telling people what they didn't want to hear, to be converted in the way they live not merely the way in which they think. Billy G has evangelized millions, Jesus just a few women. Its an interesting thought, Jesus wasn't interested in the power of millions of voices who could force the world to change, but in the power of the confession of a few honest people, whose lives prophetically called the world to change.

    Second, Leo Tolstoy once said, "Thus it is that nations have become attached to a false Christianity, represented by the church, whose principles differ from those of paganism only by a lack of sincerity." And thus our churches today have become centers of power and lack the imagination of Christ not only to inspire change, but to inspire people to remain changed.

    Peace

    J
blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes