Samenwerkings Blog, iedereen?
Geschreven door Mark Van Steenwyk: 26 september, 2007
Is iedereen geinteresseerd in het worden mede -mede-blogger op Jesus Manifesto? Ik vind als ik krijg overvloed van lezers, en regelmatige inhoud zou willen aanbieden zodat het lezerspubliek eigenlijk zou stijgen. Maar ik kan 2 goede posten uit gewoonlijk slechts aanzwengelen een week (als dat). Ik zou ernstig nadenken toevoegend een handvol meer mede-bloggers die sympathiek aan algemene vibe en de thema's van dit blog zijn en iets kunnen schrijven elke week.
Houdt het idee van het draaien jesusmanifesto in een samenwerkingsblog met 4 of meer regelmatig bloggersgeluid van een GOED idee, of slechte?
Correcte ben I in het veronderstellen dat het hebben van 1-2 posten dagelijks lezerspubliek zou verhogen?
Ik kijk in het bijzonder voor mensen die het blogging voordien op kwesties hebben gedaan die met de algemene nadruk van Jesus Manifesto passen. Als wij de juiste mengeling van bloggers kregen, zou ik ook bereid zijn om een afzonderlijke samenwerkingsblog te beginnen die ons allen toestaat om gelijke eigendom te hebben, en dan zou ik post heel wat mijn inhoud verdubbelen.
voor verdere lezing. . .
- Gevonden niets
Welk soort mengeling zoekt u? Ik denk het samenwerkings blogging een groot idee is.
Ik zou houden van te helpen een post verstrekken een week. U kunt mijn het schrijven stijl bij mijn blog (mijn naamverbindingen met het) controleren. Wij proberen ook om een gelijkaardig ding met een blog in Ginkworld te doen.
i used to be a big fan of collaborative blogs until i noticed that they often ended up just re-creating the wheel on a micro-network scale by simply cross-posting all over the place. it was rare that authors of personal AND collaborative blogs would only post on one or the other.
instead of creating MORE content, it just created more BUZZ - making it harder to navigate through my favorite blogs for something i hadn’t read already.
my suggestion would be to simply post more links to the kind of content you’re interested in generating. that or commissioning “exclusive” posts….
Hi
Sure, I’m very interested in the idea.
Ciao
Tadhg
yeah - i think this is a really good idea… 1-2 posts a day definitely increases readership…
I’d be interested in contributing 2 to 4 posts per month. You can check out my blog athttp://www.thecoredowntown.com/thecoreblog.html” rel=”nofollow”> http://www.thecoredowntown.com/thecoreblog.html
I really identify with what you’re doing in MN. I am a non-denominational church planter with no Bible degrees whatsoever (just a minor in Bible) pastoring a venue-style “church” in the nightclub district of a college town.
I think it will be a good thing if it’s well-organized, and if you (Mark) take the lead in encouraging certain types of posts to be written. I think I would personally do the best if I can do a combination of self-initiated writing, and assigned writing.
Thanks for the opportunity!
sorry about the mess up there, with the linkage.
Mark,
I would agree that a couple of additional bloggers would increase readership. The key, I think, would be to find 3-4 others who are, in your words, “sympathetic” but who have related but distinct style and content. They should be related but distinct.
I would encourage you to go out and invite particular individuals who will add to the conversation of the blog and add readers who are “sympathetic” to you but maybe aren’t quite “in to” some of the things that you write about well.
peace, courage, joy,
Daniel
I’d be interested in hearing more.
I’ve been trying to do a similar thing specifically with Quakers, and the problem has been not finding enough people interested enough in keeping it going.
I would like to post here; the possible difficulty is that I’m the sort of Christian who if anyone asks me whether I’m a Christian will usually answer “What do you mean by that?”…
(If I ever find out what “being a Christian” is “supposed to” mean, I’d very much like to be that! I see a great many people who’ve become blessings in the effort, and some who’ve very publically uglified the very idea–and it isn’t necessarily a matter of historical accuracy, except for the fact that the man lived a real life & stood for something that people still instinctively know & yearn for & shy away from!
I’ve just started reading JD Crossan’s _God & Empire_, finding it, so far, right on the edge of this question of what it means to live in God’s Kingdom vs the Kingdom of GW & his accomplices & dupes. I’ll let you know if I find out; meanwhile I just go on fishing for Guidance, receiving whatever daily bread & daily inspiration I’ve needed so far. (So are we called to join some specific Way of Life, aside from that ongoing effort to keep listening & watching for further instructions?)
Hey bro!
I’m not sure if I’m what you’re looking for, but I’d be happy to work with you on the Manifesto. Check out http://awaitingrain.typepad.com and if you think I may be a fit, let me know.
I’ve been enjoying your blog for several months now and would consider it an honor to contribute.
Having a few different voices talk around some unified themes does make a blog more interesting. But I mostly blog about the Eucharist, new monasticism and Stan Hauerwas, and almost not at all in the last two months as I’ve finished my dissertation.
I don’t know if you’ve read any of my stuff, or just click through when I harass you here. I could contribute a fortnightly post on new monasticism or something, if you’re all hot for my particular brand of snarkiness. I like what you’re about. You know, NOT the Empire.