Quick Poll: Best Books to Shape Contextual Ecclesiology快速投票：最好的书籍，以形成内容教会
Written by Mark Van Steenwyk : August 9, 2006写的马克范steenwyk ： 2006年8月9日
I get to teach a course on applied ecclesiology again this year at Bethel Seminary.我要教的课程，适用于教会今年再次在伯特利神学院。 Last year I used Frost and Hirsch’s The Shaping of Things to Come , Craig Van Gelder’s The Essence of the Church , Alan Roxburgh’s T he Missionary Congregation, Leadership, & Liminality , and David Fitch’s The Great Giveaway .去年，我用的霜冻和赫希的塑造的东西来 ，克雷格车gelder的本质，教会 ，梁家杰roxburgh的T 他传教的聚集，领导才能， ＆ liminality ，和David惠誉的伟大giveaway 。 This time around, I want to change up the readings.这个关键时刻，我要改变了读。 I’m definitely going to leave Van Gelder’s book out of the mix this year.我肯定会离开车gelder的图书走出组合今年。 It’sa great book but most of my students are decidedly low-church and Van Gelder’s book is more applicable to mainline folks.这是伟大的书，但我大部分的学生是坚决低教会和Van gelder的这本书更适用于主线的乡亲。 Any suggestions?任何建议？
for further reading .为进一步读。 . 。 . 。
- None Found无发现
I’ll give the book question a think…but I really just wanted to let you know that I am home now and that I am not playing ‘hard to get’…at least for a week.我给这本书的问题，一想… …但我真的只想让您知道我家现在和我不是在玩'难求' … …至少一个星期。 See you soon neighbor.看到你尽快邻邦。
If you can teach McLaren without endorsing everything he stands for as of late, I would reccommend “Church on the Other Side” - Also, I know it’s not a class on Church planting, but “Planting Missional Churches” by Dr. Ed Stetzer is very good and talks a ton about contextual ecclesiology.如果你可以教麦克拉伦没有赞同的一切，他主张为晚，我建议将“教会对对方” -也，我知道这不是一个阶层对教会种植，但“种植m issional教堂”博士教育署stetzer是很好的会谈和1吨约内容教会。
Have you considered Darrell Guder’s Missional Church?你有考虑（ Darrell居代的missional教会？
I’m finishing it up right now.我整理了现在。 It covers both ecclesiology and North American cultural considerations.它包括教会和北美的文化因素。
An Unstoppable Force - Erwin McManus一个不可阻挡的力量-欧文麦克马纳斯
As a comment on the McLaren book, that book seemed to be repackaged to make it more ‘postmodern’ not a bad work, but the update was not impressive.作为一个评论对迈凯轮本书，这本书似乎是重新包装，使其更具'后现代'不是一件坏事的工作，但更新不留下深刻印象。 JVD jvd
Haha, hopefully using a book in a course would never imply a full “endorsement” of anything. haha ，希望用一本书，在一个过程中绝不会意味着完整的“背书”的任何事情。
I loved Guder’s Continuing Conversion of the Church .我喜欢居代的持续转换的教会 。
I’m wondering which would be better between “Missional Church” and “Continuing Conversion of the CHurch.” Guder had his hand in both books, but I’m not sure which would be better for a sort of theological intro to missional ecclesiology.我想这将更好地之间的“ missional教会”和“继续转换的教会” 。居代了他的手在两本书，但我不能肯定这将更好地为一种神学介绍，以missional教会。
I’ve not read Continuing Conversion, so I cannot speak to that book.我已经没有看过继续转换，所以我不能讲这本书。 Two points in favor of Missional Church: the book was written as a truly collaborative effort by writers from very different Christian traditions, yet there is a clear consistency and consensus.两点，在有利于missional教会：这本书的书面作为一个真正的协作努力，作家从十分不同的基督教传统，但有一个明显的一致性和共识。 Also, they do a good job of laying cultural and theological groundwork for the principles and suggestions at the end of the book.同时，他们做好奠定文化和神学，为的原则和建议，在年底这本书。
So, that’s my two cents.所以，这就是我的2美分。
I’ve only read a little of Missional Church , and I found Continuing Conversion to be less technical and easier to read - which is why I finished that one.我只是看过一点点missional教会 ，我发现继续转换 ，以较少的技术和更容易阅读-这就是为什么我完成的其中一个。 *blushes* * * blushes